Product England
Clinical video consultations and generic video calls: what to compare
A video tool carries a conversation. A clinical service also needs suitable assessment, records, handovers and governance. Compare the complete arrangement rather than assuming a product category decides compliance.
Correct the starting assumption
It is too broad to say that a consultation using a generic video app cannot be defensible or claimable. NHS England's information governance guidance says video tools can be used following an appropriate local risk assessment. That is not blanket approval of every configuration or service.
Equally, a product marketed for healthcare does not establish the pharmacy's contractual eligibility, clinical competence or NHS claiming arrangements. The assessment should cover the whole service: who uses the tool, which information it processes, how records are made and what happens when the intended workflow cannot be completed.
Separate the call from the clinical record
Ask where the consultation is documented and how the pharmacist reaches the relevant information while speaking with the patient. A meeting history proves that a call occurred; it does not provide the full clinical assessment or evidence for every service requirement. A recording also serves a different purpose from a structured clinical record.
For Pharmacy First in England, the required NHS-assured IT arrangement remains part of the service. Adding a video platform does not automatically replace it. If two systems are involved, demonstrate the handover and make clear whether information is entered manually or transferred through a supported integration. Do not describe an integration as available until it is actually in place.
Evaluate access and privacy in practice
Check how staff sign in, how patients join, who can admit another participant and whether links can be reused. Confirm what someone outside the intended consultation could see or hear. Review what information appears in invitations, notifications, screen sharing and support logs.
The NCSC's online meeting guidance covers account protection, meeting access and the handling of recordings, chat and other data. Use those topics as prompts for a demonstration. Ask about automated transcription or meeting assistants as well as conventional recording, and verify the settings that will apply to your organisation.
Compare the work your team must supply around it
A general-purpose tool may meet the video requirement while leaving booking, patient identification, notes, escalation and follow-up to other systems or procedures. That can be workable, but the supporting work should be visible in the decision. Count repeated data entry, administration, staff training and the effort needed to investigate a problem.
A specialist platform may bring more of these tasks together. Ask the supplier to show the actual features, permissions and audit information available in the offered version. Do not assume every advertised capability is enabled, appropriate or needed. A smaller, well-understood workflow can be easier to manage than a long feature list with unclear responsibilities.
Test interruption and accessibility
Use a synthetic appointment to test sound, picture, navigation and support for the patient's communication needs. Include the actual pharmacy device and network rather than relying on a supplier's demonstration room. Check whether the on-site colleague and remote clinician can both understand the status of the encounter.
Then disconnect the call deliberately in the test environment. Observe how each participant knows what happened, how they reconnect and how incomplete work is found. The clinical team must decide the appropriate recovery method within the service's rules. Do not let the video product silently turn a clinically necessary visual assessment into an audio-only encounter.
Make the comparison evidence-led
Score each option against the same requirements and note how each requirement is met: product capability, another system, a local procedure or an unresolved gap. Ask for evidence supporting clinical safety, privacy and reliability claims, along with the relevant scope and dates.
Remote Pharmacist should be assessed through the same process. Our assurance page distinguishes current controls from work in progress, and a walkthrough can show the proposed workflow. The right choice is the arrangement your organisation can operate and govern effectively, not the one with the strongest claim on its marketing page.
Frequently asked questions
Is a generic video app prohibited for every pharmacy consultation?
No. Assess the tool and local arrangement against the relevant clinical, contractual and information-governance requirements. Suitability depends on the service and configuration.
Does specialist software make a consultation claimable?
No. The consultation and pharmacy must meet the applicable service requirements, including records and the correct submission route.
Sources & further reading
Checked against the following sources on 1 October 2026. Service rules and payments can change; use the current specification and Drug Tariff when making decisions.
- NHS England: video consultation guidance for information governance professionals
- NCSC: how to secure online meetings
- Community Pharmacy England: Pharmacy First delivery, IT and claims
This is business and service-planning information. It does not assess an individual patient, authorise a delivery model or replace local clinical and contractual decisions. Source checking is not a claim of independent clinical review.
Our editorial policy and corrections processSee it in your consultation room
A practical walkthrough, shaped around your team and the services you want to deliver.